Mumbai Court summons Municipal Commissioners for criminal offences of causing death of citizen by forceful vaccination, cheating and others.

November 02, 2022

  • Mumbai Court found Iqbal Chahal, Suresh Kakani & Sitaram Kunte prima facie guilty of criminal offences under Section 52, 166, 167, 420, 34 and 120(B) of IPC & Section 51(b), 54,55 of Disaster Management Act, 2005 for bringing unlawful vaccine mandates for various places including travelling in local train with ulterior motive to give wrongful profit to vaccine companies and being responsible for vaccine deaths of people like Hitesh Kadwe and others and also responsible for violating citizens fundamental rights. The data proved that the vaccines are having death causing side effects and many vaccinated young people are dying due to heart attacks.
  • Due to the first appearance the court did not issued non-bailable arrest warrant and ordered under Section 204 of Cr.P.C. and directed the registry to issue summons to the accused.
  • Similar action under offences of extortion will be initiated for mask mandates.
  • If convicted all the three may be sentenced to maximum punishment of seven years rigorous imprisonment.
  • Recently Supreme Court & various High Courts in India have taken cognizance of vaccine deaths and issued notice/directions to the government regarding granting compensations to the victim and their family members. Dr. Snehal Lunawat’s father had claimed Rs. 1000 Crore and Hitesh Kadwe’s mother claimed Rs.100 Crores compensation from state which later to be recovered from accused vaccine manufactures Adhar Poonawalla & Bill Gates. [Rachana Gangu v. Union of India, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1125Sayeeda K.A. v. Union of India, 2022 SCC OnLine Ker 4531Sayeeda K.A. v. Union of India, 2022 SCC OnLine Ker 4514, Dilip Lunawat v. Serum Institute of India (P) Ltd., 2022 SCC OnLine Bom 1773.]
  • Now all the accused has to apply for bail but the complainant is going to oppose their bail and it will be very difficult for accused to get bail because of the subsequent judgments of the Supreme Court & Bombay High Court where such mandates are held to be unconstitutional & illegal.
  • The complainant is going to file a Writ Petition for adding section 409, 115 etc. of IPC against the accused.
  • The Complainant actually prayed for issuance of non-bailable arrest warrant against the three but court said as a first instance summons will be issued.
  • The complaint is filed by Shri Ambar Koiri, National Steering Committee member of Awaken India Movement (AIM).
  • Adv. Ishwarlal Agarwal and other advocates represented the complainant.

There are also cases of side effects of diabetes, paralysis, neurological problems, kidney failure where cases of dialysis are increasing.

The recent study from Harvard University proved that the vaccines are 98 times more dangerous and deadly than the covid vaccines.

Link :-  https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/ethically-unjustifiable-new-harvard-johns-hopkins-study-found-covid-19-vaccines-98-times-worse-disease/

This case was earlier reported by Times of India on Dec 23, 2021
Link:- https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/mumbai-plea-in-court-seeks-nbw-against-civic-chief-2-others/articleshow/88441058.cms

 
Adv. Ishwarlal S. Agarwal

The summary of charge levelled in the complaint against the accused is as under;

“5.2. That as per Article 14, 19, 21 of Constitution of India and more particularly as per law laid down in the case of (i) Registrar General Vs. State of Meghalaya 2021 SCC OnLine Megh 130, (ii) Re Dinthar Incident Vs. State of Mizoram 2021 SCC OnLine Gau 1313 and other various landmark judgments it is clear that, there is no difference between vaccinated and non-vaccinated people. The vaccinated people can get corona, they can spread infection and they can die due to corona. Vaccinated people can also be a super spreader.

 

5.3.    Thereafter, Honourable High Court has made it clear that no discrimination can be made on the basis of vaccination status of a person.

 

5.6.    That, Shri. Satyendra Kumar Singh, Under Secretary of Health Ministry of India in his affidavit dated 08.10.2021 filed before Honourable Bombay High Court at Goa in Writ Petition No. 1820 of 2021, had clarified the Government of India’s policy decision as under;

 

“9.  That, it is further humbly submitted that the directions and guidelines released by Government of India and Ministry of Health and family Welfare, do not entail compulsory or forcible vaccination against COVID-19 disease implying that COVID-19 vaccination is completely voluntary for all citizens of India.  Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India has not formulated or suggested any policies for discrimination between citizens of India on the basis of their vaccination status.

 

  1. That, as per the existing guidelines, there is no provisions for forcing any citizen to book appointment for Covid Vaccination on Co-WIN or visiting Covid Vaccination Centre for vaccination[…….]

 

[The Copy of the said Affidavit dated 08.10.2021 is herewith Annexed and marked as Exhibit – “B” ]

 

5.7     But the Accused acted in utter disregard and defiance of the above said legal mandate and passed the following SOP, Orders, directions to discriminate the vaccinated people. The SOP dated 11.08.2021 issued by Accused No. 01 Sh. Sitaram Kunte has following clauses; […………….]

 

5.8. Hence all the Accused acted in conspiracy with each other and violated the fundamental rights of the Complainant and many other citizen.

 

5.9. That the only intention in bringing such mandate was to give benefits to the vaccine manufacturing company and thereby enable the vaccine manufacturing company make profit at the cost of citizen’s health and wellbeing.”

 

Further grievance of the complainant in his complaint dated 11th November 2021 which is exhibited at Exhibit – A to the complaint it is mentioned as under;

“11.   Shri Iqbal Chahal, Municipal Commissioner, Mumbai, and Suresh Kakani, Additional Municipal Commissioner are also involved in bringing such unlawful mandates in violation of National Authorities directives.

  1. That, due to such unlawful rules many poor people were compelled to take vaccines and many people suffered a loss of life due to side effect of vaccines, A 23 years old Young boy Shri Hitesh Kadwe died within 3 hours of getting a CoviShield vaccine. His mother Smt. Kiran Yadar have filed a Complaint against accused you officials under section 302, 409, 420, 52, 120(B), 34, 109 of Indian Penal Code and section 51(b), 55 of Disaster Management Act, 2005.
  2. Thatthe AEFI Committee of the Government has admitted that the death of Dr. Snehal Lunawat was due to side effects of Covishield vaccine.    

Link:-          https://www.lokmat.com/nashik/death-female-doctor-after-vaccination-a587/

  1. That as per law it is the duty of all the officers to publish the side effects of the vaccines before giving it to any person. [Montgomery’s Case [2015] UKSC 11, Airdale NHS Trust Vs. Bland (1993) 1 All ER 821, Common Cause Vs. Union of India (2018) 5 SCC 1]
  2. That other recent data is available at following link.

Link:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Xcp1YXr4L2nPVTSyxX0ZrcCFqWlvnaHe/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=108196494243476398221&rtpof=true&sd=true

The prayers in the complaint reads thus;

  1. a)To take cognizance of the offences under Section 52, 409, 420, 120(B), 34, 109, 167 of IPC and under Section 51(b), 55 of Disaster Management Act, 2005 against Accused Shri. Sitaram Kunte, Shri. Iqbal Chahal and Shri. Suresh Kakani.

 

  1. b)Issue process under Section 204(i)(b) of Cr. P.C. and direct registrar to issue non-baillable arrest warrants against the Accused;
  2. c)Tryand punish the Accused as per law;

The relevant sections of the IPC reads thus;

Section 166 of IPC Reads thus;

  1. Public servant disobeying law, with intent to cause injury to any person.—Whoever, being a public servant, knowingly diso­beys any direction of the law as to the way in which he is to conduct himself as such public servant, intending to cause, or knowing it to be likely that he will, by such disobedience, cause injury to any person, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both. 

Section 167 of IPC Reads thus;

  1. Procedure when investigation cannot be completed in twenty four hours.

(1) Whenever any person is arrested and detained in custody and it appears that the investigation cannot be completed within the period of twenty- four hours fixed by section 57, and there are grounds for believing that the accusation or information is well- founded, the officer in charge of the police station or the police officer making the investigation, if he is not below the rank of sub- inspector, shall forthwith transmit to the nearest Judicial Magistrate a copy of the entries in the diary hereinafter prescribed relating to the case, and shall at the same time forward the accused to such Magistrate.

(2) The Magistrate to whom an accused person is forwarded under this section may, whether he has or has not jurisdiction to try the case, from time to time, authorise the detention of the accused in such custody as such Magistrate thinks fit, for a term not exceeding fifteen days in the whole; and if he has no jurisdiction to try the case or commit it for trial, and considers further detention unnecessary, he may order the accused to be forwarded to a Magistrate having such jurisdiction: Provided that-

(a) 1 the Magistrate may authorise the detention of the accused person, otherwise than in the custody of the police, beyond the period of fifteen days; if he is satisfied that adequate grounds exist for doing so, but no Magistrate shall authorise the detention of the accused person in custody under this paragraph for a total period exceeding,-

(i) ninety days, where the investigation relates to an offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life or imprisonment for a term of not less than ten years;

  1. subs. by Act 45 of 1978, s, 13, for paragraph (a) (w, e, f, 18- 12- 1978 ).
  2. Ins. by act 10 of 1990, s. 2 (w. e. f 19- 2- 1990 )

(ii) sixty days, where the investigation relates to any other offence, and, on the expiry of the said period of ninety days, or sixty days, as the case may be, the accused person shall be released on bail if he is prepared to and does furnish bail, and every person released on bail under this sub- section shall be deemed to be so released under the provisions of Chapter XXXIII for the purposes of that Chapter;]

(b) no Magistrate shall authorise detention in any custody under this section unless the accused is produced before him;

(c) no Magistrate of the second class, not specially empowered in this behalf by the High Court, shall authorise detention in the custody of the police. 1 Explanation I.- For the avoidance of doubts, it is hereby declared that, notwithstanding the expiry of the period specified in paragraph (a), the accused shall be detained in custody so long as he does not furnish bail;]. 2 Explanation II.- If any question arises whether an accused person was produced before the Magistrate as required under paragraph (b), the production of the accused person may be proved by his signature on the order authorising detention.]

(2A) 1 Notwithstanding anything contained in sub- section (1) or sub- section (2), the officer in charge of the police station or the police officer making the investigation, if he is not below the rank of a sub- inspector, may, where a Judicial Magistrate is not available, transmit to the nearest Executive Magistrate, on whom the powers of a Judicial Magistrate or Metropolitan Magistrate have been conferred, a copy of the entry in the diary hereinafter prescribed relating to the case, and shall, at the same time, forward the accused to such Executive Magistrate, and thereupon such Executive Magistrate, may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, authorise the detention of the accused person in such custody as he may think fit for a term not exceeding seven days in the aggregate; and, on the expiry of the period of detention so authorised, the accused person shall be released on bail except where an order for further detention of the accused person has been made by a Magistrate competent to make such order; and, where an order for such further detention is made, the period during which the accused person was detained in custody under the orders made by an Executive Magistrate under this sub- section,

Section 304-A of IPC Reads thus;

304A. Causing death by negligence.—Whoever causes the death of any person by doing any rash or negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

Section 420 of IPC Reads thus;

  1. Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.—Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person de­ceived to deliver any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole or any part of a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed, and which is capable of being converted into a valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.

 

Section 120(B) of IPC Reads thus;

120B. Punishment of criminal conspiracy.—

(1) Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy to commit an offence punishable with death, 2[imprisonment for life] or rigorous imprisonment for a term of two years or upwards, shall, where no express provision is made in this Code for the punishment of such a conspiracy, be punished in the same manner as if he had abetted such offence.

(2) Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy other than a criminal conspiracy to commit an offence punishable as aforesaid shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term not exceeding six months, or with fine or with both.

Section 51(B) of Disaster Management Act Reads thus;

“51. Punishment for obstruction, etc.—

(1) Whoever, without reasonable cause— —(1) Whoever, without reasonable cause—”

(b) refuses to comply with any direction given by or on behalf of the Central Government or the State Government or the National Executive Committee or the State Executive Committee or the District Authority under this Act, shall on conviction be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine, or with both, and if such obstruction or refusal to comply with directions results in loss of lives or imminent danger thereof, shall on conviction be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years. notes on clauses Clauses 51 to 58 (Secs. 51 to 58) seeks to lay down what will constitute an offence in terms of obstruction of the functions under the Act, false claim for relief, misappropriation of relief material or funds, issuance of false warning, failure of an officer to perform the duty imposed on him under the Act without due permission or lawful excuse, or his connivance at contravention of the provisions of the Act. The clauses also provide for penalties for these offences.”

Section 55 of Disaster Management Act Reads thus;

  1. Offences by Departments of the Government.—

(1) Where an offence under this Act has been committed by any Department of the Government, the head of the Department shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly unless he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge or that he exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence. (1) Where an offence under this Act has been committed by any Department of the Government, the head of the Department shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly unless he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge or that he exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence.”

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where an offence under this Act has been committed by a Department of the Government and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to any neglect on the part of, any officer, other than the head of the Department, such officer shall be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.

Section 54 of Disaster Management Act Reads thus;

  1. Punishment for false warning.—Whoever makes or circulates a false alarm or warning   as to disaster or its severity or magnitude, leading to panic, shall on conviction, be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to one year or with fine. —Whoever makes or circulates  a false alarm or warning as to disaster or its severity or magnitude, leading to panic, shall on  conviction, be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to one year or with fine.”

Adv. Ishwarlal Agarwal represented the complainant and he was assisted by following advocates;

Adv. Meena Thakur, Adv. Sohan Agate, Adv. Pratik Jain Saklecha, Adv. Abhishek Mishra, Adv. Deepika Jaiswal, Adv. Shiv Mishra, Adv. Snehal Surve, Adv. Saurav Khanna, Adv. Vikas Pawar.

You can download a copy of the complaint Here

You can also download a copy of Mumbai Court (Issues Process) Here

Link: https://rashidkhanvaccineblog.blogspot.com/2022/11/big-breaking-mumbai-court-summons_2.html

There is no safe vaccine

THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A SAFE VACCINE.
THERE WILL NEVER BE A SAFE VACCINE.
IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO MAKE A SAFE VACCINE.

Criticism of the harmful effects of all vaccines and not just covid, is gradually growing. Illness and death as side effect of covid is now an open secret, while still being pushed onto people through the back door, since legally it is still voluntary. Excessive vaccines have been pushed into kids on fake science stating kids are born without any immunity and hence they can only survive by a plethora of vaccines early into them, as if our ancestors going back millions of years were all vaccinate by some extraterrestrial creatures, since we did not have any vaccine ourselves then.

Here is Dr Suzanne  Humphries speaking on it

Suzanne Humphries

PANDEMIC AMNESTY

Now the medical establishment is asking for a COVID amnesty, acknowledging harm done to people through the covid 19 vaccine and asks that we forget and forgive the people that pushed it.

 

And then here is an interview I did with a mother in India that lost her child to the covid vaccine. Both took the first vaccine together. Both got sick, but the mother recovered. The daughter went brain dead and died in ten days.

VACCINE DAMAGE – THE STORY OF RITHU AND HER MOTHER

 

And here is the IINFOWARS

EU Prosecutor Opens Probe Into COVID Vaccine Purchases

More will come here.
I encourage readers to post their fair comments as feedback comments at the bottom of tis blog.

Neighbours will do you in

It was the day before yesterday, on the 14th of December, that I decided to put on record my view that – under the covid based mass hypnosis, hysteria and mortal fear, the public is being programmed, incrementally, to hate us, the unvaccinated, so much, that the day is coming soon when the government will not have to send their police to grab us – out neighbours will beat us to death or burn us out of our homes.

This is the nightmare that faces us, in Canada and everywhere. But this will not happen everywhere at the same time. Some people will be influenced by propaganda sooner than others. In these countries and regions, the doomsday will arrive earlier. In other nations, later. But the ultimate destination remains the same, for everybody.

Unfortunately, in my assessment, this witch hunt against the few remaining skeptics of the official narrative, will be the first, but not the last target of public cruelty against its own people, even the very people that are risking their lives to protect what remains of their society, their democracy and the freedom of people. These vaccine skeptics are merely the first group, who appear to be a minor inconvenience in the path of global control of public opinion. I see this coming.

But ultimately, the global human society is being subverted to live under a single group of dictators, under which all national governments will function as collaborating local warlords.

In many ways, the current thin sliver of population, perhaps one in every thousand, all across the world, face a future a thousand fold more stark and cruel than what the Jews faced  in the 1930s and 40’s while Germany was under the However, this time around, extermination of the vaccine skeptics is not the final solution, but merely a tiny initial step to an unprecedentedly hazardous journey. The end result remains unpredictable, but extremely threatening, with no resemblance to anything anywhere on earth.

 

My video on Rumble, explaining my prediction

So, here are a small faction of the society, the tiny minority, that refuse to follow the order about covid and especially its voluntary vaccine. The vaccine itself is voluntary, meaning we have legal rights to either agree to take this injection, or decline to take it. Also, voluntary means that we assume all the risk if we are damaged by the vaccine or otherwise inconvenienced, or if we find that the vaccine does not give us the protection from infection that we thought it should. We cannot sue the vaccine maker, the doctor or nurse, the healthcare system or our governments for any damage or hardship we might face as a consequence of having taken the vaccine. Our relatives will not have the right to seek legal compensation should we die through adverse reaction of any of these injections. Why not” Because we voluntarily agreed to take the shot without an coercion, assuming full responsibility of any consequence. Strangely, or perhaps predictably, this voluntary vaccine has not been made indirectly mandatory. You either agree to take the injection at your own rick, or you will be prevented from leading a normal life. You shall be restricted, barred, prevented from moving freely, congregating with other people, and essentially be jailed in your own home for the rest of your life.

To cap it off, I now see how the rest f the population, including our neighbours – the same people I shared by neighbourhood with for the last twenty years, are being programmed to hate us because we have not been vaccinated. They are being taught to believe that we are endangering their lives and the lives of their children, pushing them into the danger of getting covid, although they are themselves vaccinated, simply because we refuse to do so.

I see a future where our neighbours will not just hate us, but will actually engage in driving us out of our homes and off our neighbourhood, by beating us, burning our homes, or even shooting us dead if need be, in a frenzy of public killing, because we are perceived to be a threat to our neighbours for refusing to vaccinate ourselves.

We are slated to become Jesus Christ, or Joan of Arc, because of our beliefs and the drummed up notion that our reasoning and decision on covid vaccine based on our judgment. More importantly, we must be killed because we are offering to show the light, and the truth, to what we think are misguided good people under influence of powerful shadow groups that have taken control of all avenues of communication and got an iron grip on manufacturing and guiding of public opinion.

I hope my perception is wrong, and that people will learn to love instead of hate each other, that people will stop destroying society from within. However, if I am right, I prefer to place my views on record. In case I too am martyred, at least my words might survive this new age holocaust.

However, I am also convinced that extermination or silencing of dissent about the vaccine is by no means the final solution – but merely the first tentative step towards an end that as way more frightening than Dante’s inferno.

I have described by views on the video as attached. But I intend to write it here as well …so wait till my blog is completed. ….

Meanwhile you are free to leave your comments below. I understand this is a controversial topic and many may hate me for jotting these words down. However, truth as I see it from my perspective is what I am writing about, as long as that part of the free speech is not yet muzzled.

Visionary naturopath cures 60,000 covid patients without charge in India

I have said it before and will say it here again – India is showing various paths out of this covid induced engineered nightmare that is without a parallel anywhere else on earth. And yet, this story is largely unknown in the west, and even among the westernised Indian diaspora, in India and abroad, who are still glued to controlled media, lying politicians, and state propaganda.
Clearly, there is a crying need for the rest of the world, to learn from India how you can fight off covid without the need to call 911 and how you can be a much better doctor for your own health than all the certified professionals that seem to keep you buried under a mountain of never ending medicines, procedures and vaccines.
Dr. Biswaroop Roychoudhury is an engineer and a naturopathic nutritionist with a doctorate in diabetes. He has established online course for ordinary people to be trained to treat covid and many other ailments naturopathically. His army of thus trained paramedics have gone out and treated over 60,000 covid patients, curing all of them without fail, without medication and without charge. Show me another country that has anything comparable.
In this 27 minute interview, Dr. Roychoudhury shows how you too can be a covid expert doctor for yourself, reject the injection pushing medical mafia and our governments that have gone into a nexus with this mafia and turned rogue to destroy human society as we knew it till 2019.
His web site is the source for all the topics described by Dr. Roychoudhury including the free book that you can read to teach yourself how you can be your own doctor against covid.
 
Sub-link for the books: https://biswaroop.com/free_e_book/

খোলা হাওয়ার সন্ধানে

রাণা প্রতাপকে,

আমি তাড়াতাড়ি কতগুলো কথা বলেদিই তোমাদের, রাণাপ্রতাপ। আমি ফেসবুক মোটামুটি বর্জন করেছি, যদিও আমার এখানে পাঁচ হাজার বন্ধু এবং কয়েক হাজার ফলোয়ার। আমাকে Facebook সারাক্ষণ সাবধান করছে যে আমার দরকার কিছু বন্ধুদের ছাঁটাই করে জায়গা বানাতে – নতুন বন্ধুদের আসার গেট খোলা রাখতে, কারণ ফেসবুক পাঁচ হাজারের বেশি বন্ধু মঁজুর করেনা। আগে আমি দিনে দশটা পোষ্ট করতাম এখানে নিজের দেওয়ালে – আজকাল তিনচার দিনে একটা করি। আমার YouTube’এ ৬০০  টা ভিডিও আছে এবং কয়েক হাজার ফলোয়ার ছিল। তা সত্বেও আমি দেড় বছরে একটাও ভিডিও তুলিনি ওখানে। কারণ আমি YouTube’কেও বয়কট করছি – বন্ধু বা ফলোয়ার থাক না থাক। আমি এখন বাইরের জগতবাসী – আমাকে পেতে গেলে, বা আমার  মত আরও অনেককে জানতে গেলে – এই jail’এর বাইরে বেরোতে শিখতে হবে।

আমার সঙ্গে তোমাদের যোগায়োগ রাখার কোনও প্রয়োজন নেই – কিন্তু যদি কোনও কারণে সম্পর্ক রাখতে চায় কেউ তবে এই ফেসবুক এবং ইউ-টিউবের নিয়ন্ত্রিত ভিড় ছেড়ে মাঝে মধ্যে বাইরের জগতে খোলা হাওয়ায় নি:শ্বাস নেওয়া অভ্যেস করতে হবে। এখানের বাইরেও যে একটা জগত আছে, তা দেখতে হবে, জানতে হবে। সেখানের বাসিন্দারাও কি মানুষ এবং কেন তারা এই ফেসবুকের মত নিয়ন্ত্রিত সুরক্ষিত সংগঠিত নির্মিত সীমাবদ্ধ জগত ছেড়ে বাইরের অনিয়ন্ত্রিত প্রাকৃতিক অরণ্যে, বনে বাঁদাড়ে ঘোরাঘুরি করছে, তার অনুসন্ধান করতে হবে।

আমি ফেসবুক, ‍ইউটিউব, টুইটার, ইনষ্টাগ্রাম ইত্যাদি পপুলার পল্যাটফর্ম এড়াচ্ছি আমার বাক স্বাধীনতাকে বাঁচিয়ে রাখতে। ফেসবুকে তোমার সব কিছু সমালোচনা করার অধিকার আছে – তুমি ভারতবর্ষকে, গান্ধীকে, সুভাস বোসকে, এমন কি রাম, লক্ষণ যিশু খৃষ্ট, ক্যাপিটালিজম, সোশালিজম, আকাশ পাতাল, ভগবান, শয়তান – সব কিছুকে ইচ্ছে মত সমালেচনা করতে পারবে – কেবল একটি বিষয় ছাড়া।

শুধু তুমি world health organisation, এবং তাদের প্রচারিত কোভিড কাহিনীকে, তার বিজ্ঞানকে, তার টিকা নিয়ে জোরাজুরিকে সমালেচনা করতে পারবে না। যদি তাদের সমালেচনা করা শুরু করো তখনই ওরা তোমার কমেণ্টে warning post লাগাবে, বা তোমাকে কিছু দিনের জন্য ফেসবুকে লিখতে দেবেনা, ফেসবুক jailয়ে পাঠাবে। ইউ টিউব তোমার সেই কোভিড-সমালোচনা-কাহিনীকে ডিলিট করবে। ভাড়াবাড়ি করলে তোমাকে পুরোপুরি তাড়াবে ‍ তোমার অ্যাকাউণ্ট িলিট করে দেবে। তোমাকে নতুন নামে ছদ্মবেশ আবার ঢোকার চেষ্টা করতে হবে।

এই জন্য, আমার মত অনেক লোক বাক স্বাধীনতার মূল্য বোঝে, তারা এই বেড়ির বাইরে সময় কাটাতে শিখছে – ওখানের মানুষদের সঙ্গে বসে আলাপ আলেচনা করতে শিখছে। আমি তাদের সঙ্গে সময় কাটানোটা খুব পছন্দ করি। আমার সোশাল মিডিয়ার গজত এখন মোটামুটি ওখানেই। রবীন্দ্রনাথের একটা গান এখানে দিলাম – প্রাসঙ্গিকতার জন্যঃ

—-

তোমার খোলা হাওয়া লাগিয়ে পালে
টুকরো করে কাছি, আমি ডুবতে রাজি আছি
সকাল আমার গেল মিছে
বিকেল যে যায় তারি পিছে ;
রেখো না আর, বেঁধো না আর, এই কূলের কাছাকাছি।
আমি ডুবতে রাজি আছি।
 
মাঝির লাগি আছি জাগি, সকল রাত্রিবেলা,
ঢেউগুলো যে আমায় নিয়ে করে কেবল খেলা।
ঝড়কে আমি করব মিতে
ডরব না তার ভ্রূকুটিতে ;
দাও ছেড়ে দাও ওগো, আমি তুফান পেলে বাঁচি।
আমি ডুবতে রাজি আছি।
—-

রবীন্দ্রনাথের তখনকার রাজনৈতিক পরাধীনতার ও সামাজিক সীমাবদ্ধতার সুসংগঠিত গণ্ডীর নিরাপদ শান্ত সুপরিকল্পিত জগতে থেকে নিজেকে দম বন্ধ লাগতো,  তাই এই অবরুদ্ধতার থেকে বেরোবার আশায় লিখেছিলেন ‍ ভগবান যেন তাঁকে আর এই দম আটকানো নিরাপদ কিনারায় না বেঁধে রেখে তাঁকে মুক্তি যেন দেয়, যাতে তিনি তাঁর ভাঙ্গা তরীতে পাল তুলে সেই খোলা হাওয়ায় খোলা সমুদ্রের ঢেউয়ে দুলতে পারেন। তুফান আসে – আসুক। তরী উল্টে যায় – যাক। এই সীমাবদ্ধতার থেকে মুক্তি পেতে, সেই খোলা হাওয়ায় নিঃশ্বাস নিতে পারলে, বিনিময়ে তিনি ডুবে মরতে ওবদি রাজি ছিলেন।

আজ আমরা সেই খোলা হাওয়ার সন্ধানে বেরিয়েছি, এবং একবার সেই মুক্ত আকাশের নিচে নিঃশ্বাস নিয়ে সেই লাগাম ছাড়া অনিয়ন্ত্রিত জগতকে দেখে আর এই ফেসবুকিস্থানে থাকতে ভাল লাগেনা। তাতে যদি ডুবতেও হয়, তাও গ্রহণীয়।

শেষে আরেক বাঙালির কথা সংযুক্ত করলাম এখানে – এটা আমি শুনি ঔ বাইরের খোলা জগতে। এটা কে বলেছিল তার নাম উল্লেখিত ছিল না- তা জানার উৎসাহ দেখাতে বাংলারই স্বাধীনচেতা নবযুবকরা, যারা এই সীমাবদ্ধ জগতে চোখের আড়ালে হাজারে হাজারে বাইরে বেরিয়ে এসেছে – তারা জানালো আমাকে, যে এটা নাকি রামকৃষ্ণ মিশনের এক জয়দীপ মহারাজ বলেছেন। আমি জয়দীপ মহারাজোর নামই শুনিনি আগে – কিন্তু ওনার কথা শুনে বুঝলাম, শ্বাধীন চিন্তা করার ক্ষমতা এবং কোভিডের পেছনের মহা ষড়যন্ত্রকে সাধারণ লোককে ঠাণ্ডা গলায় কি করে বোঝাতে হয় তিনি জানেন। পারলে এটা শুনো।

আমাকে এখানে বেশি ডেকোনা – আমি ফেসবুকিস্থানের নারগিকত্ব ছেড়েছি – দূরত্ব বাড়াচ্ছি এখান থেকে। তোমরা সবাই ভাল থেকো।

জয়দীপ মহারাজ – কোভিড হাহিনী

The curious case of K K Agarwal

In the continued saga of vaccine safety in India, there is this curious case of Dr. K.K. Agarwal. He was noted as one of the more prominent doctors and spokespersons in India about heart ailments. He himself was a cardiologist, President of the Confederation of Medical Association of Asia and Oceania (CMAAO), President of the Heart Care Foundation of India and the Past National President of Indian Medical Association (IMA).

He was also the most notable doctor to be publicly supporting the idea that all living Indians should immediately opt to take a vaccine to protect themselves from covid-19.

He not only advised all people to get vaccinated, he also got the shots himself, and set an example by publicising it.

And then, shortly afterwards, in May this year (May 2021), he developed health complications reportedly from a covid infection, and had to be hospitalised. Apparently, the vaccination did not prevent him from covid infection. More over, Wikipedia report seems to indicate that his family declared that his death was linked to covid complications.

There is a lot of speculation and news is being carefully shrouded not to disclose too much on what is happening with this developing covid related health problems as a possible consequence of adverse reaction from some of the vaccines, pointing to the possibility that these vaccines, apart from not being approved, are potentially harmful for some people.

There are people that talk about the mRNA vaccine, by design, is causing unintended side effects such as blood clotting, which in turn can lead to cardiac issues for some. To further complicate matters, some doctors seem to suspect that the very treatment and drugs given to treat these conditions are themselves suspect and might lead to further deterioration of conditions.

In other words, the vaccine itself might lead to cardiac problems. Hospitalisation might lead to treatment for cardiac arrest that are suspect. Result might be further deterioration leading to death from cardiac arrest, but recorded as covid death.

So, which came first – the vaccine or the covid ? And is going to the hospital a very bad idea if you have covid vaccine related heart condition?

Some doctors are whispering about K.K. Agarwal not being the only doctor that died from the vaccine, even if he is the most famous victim. Truth about this issue is being suppressed, but has leaked out already, in India.

Puzzling times.